Research Review Service for Chiropractors & Physiotherapists
RRS Introduction Video
The Epicurean Scholar Upscale Continuing Education
Clinically applicable evidence informed information for chiropractors, physical therapists, rehabilitation professionals, & students.

RRS Welcomes Members of the Following

  • Association Francaise de Chiropractique
  • Finnish Chiropractic Union
  • Nova Scotia College of Chiropractors
  • British Chiropractic Association
  • Ontario Chiropractic Association
  • Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
  • Can. Society of Chiropractic Evaluators

RRS Affiliate Partners

first
  
last
  
start
stop

RRS Proudly Sponsors

first
  
last
 
 
start
stop

This Week

'Full Kinetic Chain vs. Targeted Treatment for Hip Osteoarthritis'
Subscribe Now With PayPal
Subscribe Using Mail-In Form
Get RRS NEWSLETTER 
Email:
Confirm email:
I prefer HTML format

Unsubscribe

Join RRS Affiliate Program

Subscriber Directory

Join us on Facebook

Practitioners

Commendations

"Dear Shawn,
Your letter announcing your new article on 'Low Back Pain - A Contemporary Healthcare Crisis' made me proud of (what) our profession (can be). As a member of CMCC's Board of Governors it is my duty to see that our Vision (to be an academic institution recognized for creating leaders in spinal health) is fulfilled. The approach to practice that you espouse is perfectly in line with the ethic that properly garners the cultural authority to be leaders in spinal health. I sincerely hope that your voice rings out beyond the circle of "informed" practitioners to educate both the outliers in our profession as well as the many stakeholders who stand to gain from chiropractic establishing it's rightful place in the health care community.
Thank you,
Dr. David Gryfe, Fellow of the Royal College of Chiropractic Sports Sciences (Canada)"
"Nicely done! The reports are a bit more detailed than I have seen others offer, and from what I can tell, they seem prudent and well considered. This is no small thing- too many secondary source sites seem to provide short and not all that informative reports, and some have significant biases. I see that the bias, if that is the correct term here, is simply to present best evidence and not to slant conclusions toward some preconceived stance. This is very good. So, long story short, it’s well done. Congrats to you for that.
Dana J. Lawrence, DC, MMedEd, MA"